We can look at Goodwin's theories to identify whether or not the group is conventional in terms of the music video in the genre of alternative rock. the first thing we see is that the group is breaking convention with the clothing the band is wearing. it is conventional in alternative rock videos that the artists are wearing fairly smart attire. whereas in this video the clothes are casual. Convention is again broken due to the location of the artists, the artists are in very common locations. such as a house, driving on a country lane and walking the streets, it is typical in alternative rock to see artists in bizarre locations. these 'rule breaks' could be said to be deliberate more by the artist to break the dominant ideology and continue to position themselves as rebels. therefore in the artist is portraying themselves as unconventional to create the meta-narrative.
Todorov's structural linguist theory cannot be applied to the video as the video contains no real narrative, as the visuals just follow a part of the life of a group of disabled people. however this is common of alternative rock bands, therefore, it is used to ensure the group are not totally disassociated with the genre.
The use of binary oppositions in the video, is however, used to good effect, the disabled people and the able bodied singers juxtaposed against each other show that the band are supporting of all people helping the meta narrative of the band. this is done as the band are shown to be doing simple everyday things that anyone can do. however the less able people are doing the extraordinary things positioning the disabled people as the more active people and the more effective, thus creating ideological discourse, both showing the band to be appealing to all audiences and being supportive, thus helping their meta-narrative. but they are also harking back to their appearance as rebels as they do something which is unexpected.





well done Jack - deadline met, work of high standard. More detailed comments to follow
ReplyDelete